The California Privacy Protection Agency (“CPPA”) recently released modified draft California Consumer Privacy Act regulations (“CCPA Regs.”) in response to public feedback, with a focus on the sections addressing cybersecurity audits, risk assessments, automated decisionmaking technology (“ADMT”) and sensitive data.
Cybersecurity Audits
New Definition of “Cybersecurity Audit Report”: The updated CCPA Regs. adds a definition of “cybersecurity audit report,” clarifying that the term refers to the specific documentation required as part of a business’s annual cybersecurity audit required under Article 9 of the CCPA Regs. (CCPA Regs. Sect. 7001(n)).
Expanded Scope of “Information Systems”: The definition of “information system” was revised to explicitly include service providers’ or contractors’ systems used on behalf of the business. This ensures businesses account for third-party environments when assessing cybersecurity risk. (CCPA Regs. Sect. 7001(w)).
Deadline-Specific Requirements for First Cybersecurity Audit: The updated CCPA Regs. include deadlines by which a business must complete its first cybersecurity audit, which is dependent upon when a business determines its processing activities present significant risk to consumers’ security. (CCPA Regs. Sect. 7121(a)).
Scope and Documentation of Cybersecurity Audits: The updated CCPA Regs. clarify that auditors may include recommendations “separate from articulating audit findings,” helping delineate reporting expectations. (CCPA Regs. Sect. 7122(a)(1)). The Regs. also include examples of what how a cybersecurity audit report must describe the audit’s scope (e.g., the processes, activities and components of the information system assessed), and extend the requirement to retain documents to both the business and the business’s auditor. (CCPA Regs. Sects. 7122(d), (j)).
Risk Assessments: Updates to Roles, Disclosures and Safeguards
Responsible Personnel and Decisionmakers: The updated CCPA Regs. now require that risk assessments identify not only the individuals who reviewed or approved the assessment but also the individual with the authority to determine whether the business will proceed with the associated data processing activity. (CCPA Regs. Sect. 7152(a)(9)).
Timing for Risk Assessments: The updated CCPA Regs. establish a calendar deadline for conducting risk assessments for data processing activities that began prior to the updated regulations’ effective date but continue afterward. (CCPA Regs. Sect. 7155(c)).
Automated Decisionmaking Technology (“ADMT”)
Consumer Rights and Business Obligations: The updated CCPA Regs. specify that, upon a consumer’s opt-out request, businesses must notify service providers and contractors of the specific ADMT use for which the consumer opted out. (CCPA Regs. Sect. 7221(n)(2)).
Removed Requirement to Document “Quality of Personal Information” in ADMT Risk Assessments: The CPPA removed a provision that would have required businesses to assess and document the quality of personal information (e.g., the accuracy, reliability and consistency of the information) used in ADMT or artificial intelligence (“AI”) systems. (CCPA Regs. Sect. 7152(a)(2)(B)).
Expanded Definitions of Sensitive Data Categories
Addition of “Neural Data”: The definition of “sensitive personal information” was revised to include “neural data,” aligning with other states’ emerging concerns around brain-computer interface technologies. (CCPA Regs. Sect. 7001(ddd)).
Exemption for Non-Identifiable Physical/Biological Traits: The CPPA added an exception to the definition of “physical or biological identification or profiling,” excluding traits that cannot be linked to a specific consumer. (CCPA Regs. Sect. 7001(hh)).
Notice at Collection – AR/VR and Device-Based Interactions
Timing Flexibility for Notice in New Environments: The updated CCPA Regs. allow businesses to provide notice either before or “at the time” a device begins collecting personal information that the business sells or shares. (CCPA Regs. Sects. 7013(e)(3)(C), (D). This change accommodates more dynamic and immersive tech environments.
Enforcement and Simplification Measures
Removed Requirements for Agency Complaint Information: The CPPA removed the obligation to inform consumers about their ability to file complaints with the CPPA or Attorney General.
Deleted Redundancies and Technical Burdens: Several provisions were struck to streamline requirements, including § 7023(f)(3), which previously required businesses to notify others that a consumer contests certain personal data accuracy claims.
Businesses subject to the CCPA should review these changes carefully, ensure internal alignment with new deadlines and definitions, and prepare for continued rulemaking as the CPPA moves toward finalizing these updates.
Search
Recent Posts
- CPPA Proposes Key Updates to Cybersecurity, Risk Assessment and ADMT CCPA Regulations Following Public Comment
- DOJ Final Rule on Bulk Transfer of Sensitive U.S. Personal and Government Data to Countries and Persons of Concern Goes Into Effect
- CIPL Releases Paper on Privacy-Enhancing and Privacy-Preserving Technologies in AI: Enabling Data Use and Operationalizing Privacy by Design and Default
Categories
- Behavioral Advertising
- Centre for Information Policy Leadership
- Children’s Privacy
- Cyber Insurance
- Cybersecurity
- Enforcement
- European Union
- Events
- FCRA
- Financial Privacy
- General
- Health Privacy
- Identity Theft
- Information Security
- International
- Marketing
- Multimedia Resources
- Online Privacy
- Security Breach
- U.S. Federal Law
- U.S. State Law
- Workplace Privacy
Tags
- Aaron Simpson
- Accountability
- Adequacy
- Advertisement
- Advertising
- Age Appropriate Design Code
- American Privacy Rights Act
- Anna Pateraki
- Anonymization
- Anti-terrorism
- APEC
- Apple Inc.
- Argentina
- Arkansas
- Article 29 Working Party
- Artificial Intelligence
- Audit
- Australia
- Austria
- Automated Decisionmaking
- Baltimore
- Bankruptcy
- Behavioral Advertising
- Belgium
- Biden Administration
- Big Data
- Binding Corporate Rules
- Biometric Data
- Blockchain
- Bojana Bellamy
- Brazil
- Brexit
- British Columbia
- Brittany Bacon
- Brussels
- Business Associate Agreement
- BYOD
- California
- CAN-SPAM
- Canada
- Cayman Islands
- CCPA
- CCTV
- Chile
- China
- Chinese Taipei
- Christopher Graham
- CIPA
- Class Action
- Clinical Trial
- Cloud
- Cloud Computing
- CNIL
- Colombia
- Colorado
- Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission
- Compliance
- Computer Fraud and Abuse Act
- Congress
- Connecticut
- Consent
- Consent Order
- Consumer Protection
- Cookies
- COPPA
- Coronavirus/COVID-19
- Council of Europe
- Council of the European Union
- Court of Justice of the European Union
- CPPA
- CPRA
- Credit Monitoring
- Credit Report
- Criminal Law
- Critical Infrastructure
- Croatia
- Cross-Border Data Flow
- Cross-Border Data Transfer
- Cyber Attack
- Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency
- Data Brokers
- Data Controller
- Data Localization
- Data Privacy Framework
- Data Processor
- Data Protection Act
- Data Protection Authority
- Data Protection Impact Assessment
- Data Transfer
- David Dumont
- David Vladeck
- Deceptive Trade Practices
- Delaware
- Denmark
- Department of Commerce
- Department of Health and Human Services
- Department of Homeland Security
- Department of Justice
- Department of the Treasury
- Department of Treasury
- District of Columbia
- Do Not Call
- Do Not Track
- Dobbs
- Dodd-Frank Act
- DORA
- DPIA
- E-Privacy
- E-Privacy Directive
- Ecuador
- Ed Tech
- Edith Ramirez
- Electronic Communications Privacy Act
- Electronic Privacy Information Center
- Electronic Protected Health Information
- Elizabeth Denham
- Employee Monitoring
- Encryption
- ENISA
- EU Data Protection Directive
- EU Member States
- European Commission
- European Data Protection Board
- European Data Protection Supervisor
- European Parliament
- European Union
- Facial Recognition Technology
- FACTA
- Fair Credit Reporting Act
- Fair Information Practice Principles
- Federal Aviation Administration
- Federal Bureau of Investigation
- Federal Communications Commission
- Federal Data Protection Act
- Federal Trade Commission
- FERC
- Financial Data
- FinTech
- Florida
- Food and Drug Administration
- Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act
- France
- Franchise
- Fred Cate
- Freedom of Information Act
- Freedom of Speech
- Fundamental Rights
- GDPR
- Geofencing
- Geolocation
- Geolocation Data
- Georgia
- Germany
- Global Privacy Assembly
- Global Privacy Enforcement Network
- Gramm Leach Bliley Act
- Hacker
- Hawaii
- Health Data
- HIPAA
- HITECH Act
- Hong Kong
- House of Representatives
- Hungary
- Illinois
- India
- Indiana
- Indonesia
- Information Commissioners Office
- Information Sharing
- Insurance Provider
- Internal Revenue Service
- International Association of Privacy Professionals
- International Commissioners Office
- Internet
- Internet of Things
- Iowa
- IP Address
- Ireland
- Israel
- Italy
- Jacob Kohnstamm
- Japan
- Jason Beach
- Jay Rockefeller
- Jenna Rode
- Jennifer Stoddart
- Jersey
- Jessica Rich
- John Delionado
- John Edwards
- Kentucky
- Korea
- Latin America
- Laura Leonard
- Law Enforcement
- Lawrence Strickling
- Legislation
- Liability
- Lisa Sotto
- Litigation
- Location-Based Services
- London
- Louisiana
- Madrid Resolution
- Maine
- Malaysia
- Markus Heyder
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- Meta
- Mexico
- Microsoft
- Minnesota
- Mobile
- Mobile App
- Mobile Device
- Montana
- Morocco
- MySpace
- Natascha Gerlach
- National Institute of Standards and Technology
- National Labor Relations Board
- National Science and Technology Council
- National Security
- National Security Agency
- National Telecommunications and Information Administration
- Nebraska
- NEDPA
- Netherlands
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- New Zealand
- Nigeria
- Ninth Circuit
- North Carolina
- North Korea
- Norway
- Obama Administration
- OCPA
- OECD
- Office for Civil Rights
- Office of Foreign Assets Control
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Online Behavioral Advertising
- Online Privacy
- Opt-In Consent
- Oregon
- Outsourcing
- Pakistan
- Parental Consent
- Payment Card
- PCI DSS
- Penalty
- Pennsylvania
- Personal Data
- Personal Health Information
- Personal Health Information
- Personal Information
- Personally Identifiable Information
- Peru
- Philippines
- Phyllis Marcus
- Poland
- PRISM
- Privacy By Design
- Privacy Policy
- Privacy Rights
- Privacy Rule
- Privacy Shield
- Profiling
- Protected Health Information
- Ransomware
- Record Retention
- Red Flags Rule
- Rhode Island
- Richard Thomas
- Right to Be Forgotten
- Right to Privacy
- Risk-Based Approach
- Rosemary Jay
- Russia
- Safe Harbor
- Sanctions
- Schrems
- Scott Kimpel
- Securities and Exchange Commission
- Security Rule
- Senate
- Sensitive Data
- Serbia
- Service Provider
- Singapore
- Smart Grid
- Smart Metering
- Social Media
- Social Security Number
- South Africa
- South Carolina
- South Dakota
- South Korea
- Spain
- Spyware
- Standard Contractual Clauses
- State Attorneys General
- Steven Haas
- Stick With Security Series
- Stored Communications Act
- Student Data
- Supreme Court
- Surveillance
- Sweden
- Switzerland
- Taiwan
- Targeted Advertising
- Telecommunications
- Telemarketing
- Telephone Consumer Protection Act
- Tennessee
- Terry McAuliffe
- Texas
- Text Message
- Thailand
- Transparency
- Transportation Security Administration
- Trump Administration
- United Arab Emirates
- United Kingdom
- United States
- Unmanned Aircraft Systems
- Uruguay
- Utah
- Vermont
- Video Privacy Protection Act
- Video Surveillance
- Virginia
- Viviane Reding
- Washington
- Whistleblowing
- Wireless Network
- Wiretap
- ZIP Code